This was a big one- 9 different articles on the table and several more actively discussed. As of today (July 1st, 2026) we are also officially working without a contract.
As always these updates are not totally comprehensive, especially with this many articles being discussed. We tend to assume folks are not as interested in our debate about the technical definition of days (which did happen) as they are about wages, whether they are protected from discrimination, or can take bereavement leave.
When in doubt you can always watch the playback yourself. Don't let the length of the video intimidate you- half of it is recording an empty room while we caucus and you are allowed to skip it.
If you skip it though you might miss Anderson accidentally hitting a chair on the way out of the room while waiving to the camera [01:57:50]
While we're grateful that the ESD returned so many articles this session, there's a lot we were less than thrilled with. From rolling back protections to failing to provide us with a wage counter before our current contract expires there's a lot to unpack.
The ESD let us know they should have a counter to our wage proposal next session July 15th. That will mean nearly 100 days (97 to be exact) will have gone by since we initially proposed wages.
The ESD countered our grievance language to remove our ability to grieve inequitable application of our contract - a topic that has led to some of the most intense moments at the bargaining table. Our stance has remained consistent session after session, but we'll say it again:
In their counter for Article 13 - Paid Leaves of Absence, the ESD completely rejected both our definition of family member as currently defined in law and rejected our language making a loss of pregnancy eligible for bereavement leave. [34:50 -35:42]
We did not expect it to be controversial to enshrine protections for every type of family regardless of whether or not state or federal law continue to protect them.
We did not expect it to be controversial to enshrine protections for grieving families. Nor do we believe it is appropriate to say it is sufficient to insist they just use unpaid leave through OFLA.
The ESD rejected both our proposal for two additional holidays (in parity with many of our districts) and proposal to make more staff eligible for vacation days, citing concerns with staff absences. Our belief is that it is easier to deal with planned vacation days than last minute mental health days due to staff burnout. We believe the research regarding the benefits of vacation time and time off in general has been clear for a very long time and is a benefit to the ESD in the long term. [02:33:45 - 02:34:42]*
*When pressed about the holiday question we were ready with the data because you can always count on our team to do our homework [ 02:43:35 - 02:44:30]
[01:04:59 - 01:10:56]
We talked a lot about job descriptions this session and how and when they get updated. One thing that we want everyone to take away from this conversation is that the ESD has to notify us about changes to our job descriptions - so if you take a look at your current job description and it is not what you remember please reach out to Anderson or Ethan.*
Whether it's a simple zhuzh or a complete overhaul, any change in working conditions is a mandatory subject of bargaining.
[03:34:34 - 03:42:10]
While we originally proposed a Position Review Committee we returned a counter honoring the ESDs desire to be responsible to job descriptions and codifying our stance that, at the end of the day, we just want job descriptions to be regularly updated and accurate. While we'd prefer the committee format - if the ESD wants us to demand to bargaining every change we are willing to do that.
*Anderson's note: I literally just checked my job description and I went from 11 things under my required Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities to 16 at some point 👀
⏰ What Was Discussed
The ESD brought:
Article 8 - Personnel Records
Article 11 - Grievance Procedure
Article 13 - Paid Leaves of Absence
Article 15 - Paid Vacation
Article 18 - Holiday
Article 22 - Reclassification, Job Descriptions
Article 25 - Labor Management Committee
Article 26 - General Provisions
Our team didn't have any articles prepared this session because we needed to ensure we were on the same page - largely regarding contracting out with impacts several articles (24, 4, 2, etc) - before continuing to counter [01:13:50] Notably we asked about:
When we can expect to see a wage proposal
Clarifying how the ESD views our contracted our "pipeline issue" positions (contracting for OTAs, SPLAs, etc). Current language would consider them temporary employees which means they would become members of the bargaining unit after 90 days - which would run counter to our agreement with the subcontracting agencies.
After caucus we returned counters on:
Article 8 - Personnel Records
Article 18 - Holiday
Article 25 - Labor Management Committee
The ESD also provides us with a counter on Article 2 - Recognition in response to our earlier questions.
After another caucus:
We returned a counter on Article 22 - Reclassification, Job Descriptions
The ESD returned a counter on Article 25 - Labor Management Committee
We had one final caucus to discuss Article 25 - Labor Management Committee
✒️ What Was Decided:
✨Todays was another productive discussion with both teams caucusing productively and bringing back counter proposals which got us to our third Tentative Agreement (TA) on Article 25 - Labor Management Committee [03:51:40]
In addition to confirming our July 15th daytime session 9:00a to 4:00p (working lunch from 12:00p to 1:00p) we rescheduled our July 22nd session for August 19th (1:00p to 5:00pm) per scheduling conflicts from the ESD
🗓️ What Comes Next:
July 15th at 9:00am - Bargaining Session #10
Recordings are available on our website
In honor of our discussion around bringing cupcakes to Labor Management meetings and TA'ing that article- check out another bargaining recipe! This time one of Anderson's favorites: Chocolate Raspberry Mousse Cake.
If you're intimidated- just add an extra dash of salt and vanilla to a boxed mix and focus on the frosting and filling.
If you noticed this update coming out a bit later than normal- you're right! Bargaining earlier than normal and then going right back to regular work afterwards definitely threw off our rhythm, but you can still count on a wrap up after each session even as we bargain through the summer. As always, if you've got questions you can always reach out directly to any member of the bargaining team any time.
While we were disappointed that we still didn't receive a counter for our compensation package this week, we were glad to see movement again and even TA'd our second article!
We finished going through Article 12 - Working Conditions after beginning it last session, largely discussing places to align safety language and t remote work language. The ESD countered by cutting our remote language entirely, stating that they would prefer to address remote work in a separate MOA (We reminded them that we are only proposing a one year contract right now anyway). Our stance is simple- there should be a policy around remote work and it should be applied equitably. We do not believe it is a high standard to insist that any request- be it unpaid leave, remote work, or otherwise- not be arbitrarily denied. Permitting the ESD unchecked discretion opens the door to disparate and discriminatory treatment.
They want the option to do the right thing, we want them to have an obligation to do the right thing
Article 19 - Layoff/Recall was largely status quo language from us with our main focus on workshopping the bumping clusters we brought last session. We also proposed an increase from two days to five when deciding if you will exercise bumping rights and insisted that 30 days notice of a reduction is reasonable regardless of circumstance (and 10 days notice is definitely unreasonable).
After trading Article 10 - Probation back and forth a few times, agreeing to counting in days rather than months, and insisting on probationary staff receiving multiple instances of support we were able to TA our second article!
🐦⬛Bargaining Break Bonus: In our last caucus we just hung out in the bargaining room and waited for the ESD to come back with their counter. The camera also stayed on so you can see Anderson's impromptu bargaining yoga - including being thrilled to still have a crow pose in them (and not fall on their face in the middle of negotiations) [02:53:45].
⏰ What Was Discussed
The ESD finished discussion Article 12 - Working conditions from last session and brought:
Article - 24 Contracting Out
Article X2 - Classified Staff with Licensure
Our team is still waiting on responses to Articles 1 and 9 since they heavily impact many of the articles we are preparing responses for. We are also still waiting on both the compensation and insurance articles which we are eager to see since we haven't heard an update in more than two months. In the meantime, we presented:
Article 10 - Probation
Article 19 - Layoff/Recall
The ESD counter Article 10 after caucus, the union re countered after another caucus, and the ESD provided a final counter (mostly grammatical edits) that the parties agreed to TA
✒️ What Was Decided:
✨Todays was another productive discussion with both teams caucusing productively and bringing back counter proposals which got us to our second Tentative Agreement (TA) on Article 10 - Probation
There was substantial discussion on the other articles that were brought forward today, but our team felt we needed additional time for member feedback before preparing counters. Particularly as it relates to Article X2 - Classified Staff with Licensure
In addition to confirming our June 29th daytime session (1:00pm - 5:00pm) we are still holding:
Tentative: All Day July 15th
Tentative: All Day July 22nd
🗓️ What Comes Next:
June 29th at 1:00pm - Bargaining Session #8
Recordings are available on our website
After all of the hubub and hijinks last session, we know folks have been eager to see what happens next...
For our 7th session we sat down to discuss a pretty short number of articles in depth, had a lovely guest speaker, Kristy Cousineau, come visit, and were generally pleased to see the movement the ESD is making to engage with the language we've been putting forward.
✂️ We employed the time honored tradition of rock, paper, scissors to decide who presented first
Our team presented a draft of what a new bumping chart for Article 19 - Layoff/Recall. We want to try collaboratively designing our bumping clusters which will then inform the final language we propose. Simply put, in the event of a layoff, our staff can only "bump" within their exact job description currently and we want to strike a balance that afford folks more options - but it gets complicated quick!
The ESD presented on Article 10 - Probation and we were in broad agreement about the necessity of support and evaluation. Our disagreements centered around much smaller details like whether probation being counted in days or months was clearer.
Article 12 - Working Conditions (referred to in the room as "our beefy boy") was the other big topic. We saw movement from the ESD on things like comp time and safe staffing levels but weren't able to finish discussions in some places we saw less movement, like wholesale rejecting our remote work language.
✨A huge shout out and thank you to, Kristy Cousineau! Kristy is an SLPA with Reynolds School District and their OSEA Chapter 37 President who graciously offered to come answer some questions about our Classified Staff with Licensures proposal. If you've been frequenting our chapter website you've secretly already seen her! Several folks on our team had the pleasure of meeting Kristy at an OSEA training where we talked collaboration and snagged some photos together.
This month will mark the end of our current contract with the ESD so it's important for folks to understand what it means (and what it doesn't mean) to be "working without a contract".
❌ The ESD cannot suddenly make unilateral changes to our working conditions, wages, or benefits
❌ The ESD cannot suddenly fire you unjustly
✅ We are still protected from unjustified firings and discipline and protected by just-cause procedures
✅ We are still both required to bargain in good faith
The most notable concern for many of our staff is that the usual Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) and step increase we usually receive effective in July will not occur yet. Those will only become effective once the contract is ratified and we will insist that everyone receives that pay retroactively.
We know the strain our colleagues are already feeling, which is why we will continue to fight for a wage package that's worth the wait. In the meantime, the best thing you can do is to continue showing up and letting the ESD know that respect requires a living wage.
⏰ What Was Discussed
Our team is still waiting on responses to Articles 1, 9, and 24 since they heavily impact many of the articles we are preparing responses for. In the meantime, we presented:
Appendix B: Bumping Chart
The ESD brought:
Article 10 - Probation
Article 12 - Working Conditions
We then took a break to welcome our guest speaker, Kristy Cousineau to help answer questions about our classified staff with licensure proposal.
No additional proposals were traded
✒️ What Was Decided:
Todays focus was largely on discussion with us actually not taking any breaks at all to caucus! While no additional articles have been agreed to yet, we appreciated the movement from the ESD on the two articles they brought forward and their willingness to engage in additional summer bargaining sessions.
In addition to confirming our June 16th daytime session (12:00pm - 3:00pm) we added:
June 29th - 1:00p - 5:00p
Tentative: All Day July 15th
Tentative: All Day July 22nd
🗓️ What Comes Next:
June 16th at 12:00pm - Bargaining Session #8
Recordings are available on our website
Listen, we know bargaining can feel dry at times even if it is incredibly important.
Last night though? Well, it's probably best described by the emojis folks sent to the bargaining team when we had a sudden caucus in the middle of discussions: 🤯😬
As always, the recordings are available for you to see for yourself, but we'll do our best to make sense of the situation for folks because it was genuinely shocking.
Last night we continued of our conversations from before about our belief that employees should be able file discrimination complaints however they are most comfortable- including the union grievance process with a right to union representation. We believe it is antithetical to the ESD's values for them to continue to push restrictions in our contract that limit our ability to address inequality.
The ESD continued to push that existing complaint mechanisms through BOLI (which currently has a noted discrimination backlog, leaving folks waiting six month on average) and other external litigation.
When we pointed out that litigation involves paying lawyers, the ESDs lawyer, Brian Hungerford, took offense to the implication that he had any monetary interest in this process and called for an immediate caucus. (50:10 - the full lead up discussion begins ~34:50).
The ESD didn't bring it up when they came back, but we clarified our intent after they shared their remaining articles (01:18:43):
"When we hear litigate, our members are gonna have to hire representation, go through BOLI, do whatever they need to do. And there's an inherent monetary piece that the ESD must push forward for litigation as well... What our team is expressing is that we'd rather have the grievance process to avoid that monetary piece."
✊ It was a tense moment in the room and we want to be clear: we're not trying to be mean to anyone. We do think is that it's not very nice is to insist that our staff experiencing discrimination should just scrape together the funds to pay for a lawyer if they want support though.
We're obviously not trying to be unkind to anyone when we advocate for our colleagues. However, it's also worth noting that even if we were rude at the table it wouldn't break the rules of bargaining- tense conversations are expected and should be engaged in.
"otherwise lawful union activities do not lose protection under the PECBA simply because they are exercised in a way that fails to meet the employer’s expectation of proper decorum and diplomacy"
That's a citation the ESD should be aware of because it was included in a recent Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) filing against them. In which, it was found that the ESD violated labor law and was required to post notice in all of its buildings and send notice to all licensed staff
You can go check out the notice in your break room or read the full Employment Relations Board ruling online.
⏰ What Was Discussed
Our team proposed counters on several articles as well as our initial proposal for new language supporting our classified staff with licensure (shout out to our OTAs and SLPAs! :
Article 1 – Preamble
Article 8 – Personnel Records
Article 10 – Probation
NEW Article X2 - Classified Staff with Licensure
The ESD brought:
Article 2 - Recognition
Article 4 - Management Rights
Article 14 - Unpaid Leaves of Absence
The ESD asked for a sudden caucus in the middle of discussion before coming back to provide their final articles for the day:
Article 16 - Vacancies, Transfers, and Job Postings
Article 23 - Strikes and Lockouts
No additional proposals were traded
✒️ What Was Decided:
Our team requested responses on Article 1 and Article 24 be provided at the next session since they impact our ability to move forward with most of the articles proposed today. We also let them know we are eager to see their response on Article 10 - Grievance Procedure (for similar reasons) as well as finances.
We shared that we think we're close on Article 23, but wanted additional time to bring it back next session.
🗓️ What Comes Next:
June 4th at 2:30pm - Bargaining Session #7
Let us send you some swag! Folks let us know they wanted more ways to support and we heard you! Members can let us know you size and where you want you brand new OSEA 101 shirt
Recordings are available on our website
We are in the full swing of capital 'N' Negotiations now, folks! Session #5 had even more active discussion across the table, our first TA (or tentative agreement), our first sidebar, and a brief accidental "Stuart Cam" moment. With all of these discussion heavy sessions we really do strongly suggest folks listen to the recordings themselves whenever you can. We'll always do our best to help you make sense of the highlights and the buzzwords in these updates, but there is never a substitute for seeing for yourself.
Some folks have asked us about our two friends at the table who don't work at the ESD and have been doing a lot of the talking. On the ESD's side they've got Brian Hungerford, a lawyer from Hungerford Law Firm. On our side we've got Baylor Turnbow, our union rep from the state OSEA office.
Most folks don't get to see Baylor much unless they're involved in chapter leadership, the bargaining team, or he's supporting you when you need union representation. He is a critical part of our support system who brings a wealth of experience and knowledge and so we did want to take a moment to shout him out. Here's some fun facts about Baylor:
🏫 He's a former school teacher!
🎷 He plays the saxophone
🥣 He makes incredible scones*
*Anderson's note: Baylor say's they're just an America's Test kitchen recipe "and just sub jalapeños for a thing of chives" but I was a professional baker for a while and they're the best scones I've ever had so I suspect some kind of union magic
There was a lot of back and forth about discrimination complaints (discussion from approximately 15:00 to 25:00) and our proposal to strike language that prohibits discrimination based grievances. Our stance is that we want employees to be able to use whatever complaint process they are most comfortable with in navigating discrimination complaints. That should include the union grievance process and the right to union representation.
📙 For the folks who heard that discussion and thought that book sounded interesting, check out Complaint by Sarah Ahmed!
Personnel files were another big topic of discussion (approximately 26:50 to 34:40). The issue centering around our proposed language allowing for discipline to be removed from employees files after three years, provided no new incidents have occurred are not considered flagrant misconduct. We believe that discipline should help people grow and learn from their mistakes and when stale or irrelevant discipline remain in employee files it can introduce bias.
We TA'd our first article! Article 7 - Union Dues. If you aren't sure what that (or some of the other jargon that got thrown around this session) means, you aren't alone! Check out Bargaining 101 to learn more!
⏰ What Was Discussed
Our team proposed counters on several articles to begin with:
Article 7 - Union Dues
Article 14 - Unpaid Leaves of Absence
Article 23 - Strikes and Lockouts
Article 24 - Contracting Out
Article 25 - Labor Management Committee
Article 26 - General Provisions
The ESD brought:
Article 1 – Preamble
Article 8 – Personnel Records
Article 9 – Discipline and Dismissal
Article 10 – Probation
We provided counterproposals to several articles:
Article 1 – Preamble
Article 8 – Personnel Records
Article 9 – Discipline and Dismissal
The ESD provided an amended proposal for Article 1 – Preamble
We then had a Sidebar to confidentially discuss Costing (confidentially comparing how we calculated the costs of our proposals)
✒️ What Was Decided:
✨ Both parties reached out first Tentative Agreement (TA) on Article 7 - Union Dues (you can watch us all cheer at about 01:35:50)
Both parties discussed what proposals each team would bring to next session and agreed to cancel the May 21st session due to scheduling conflicts
🗓️ What Comes Next:
April 30th at 6:00pm - OSEA Chapter Meeting (good opportunity to ask questions)
May 7th at 2:30p - Bargaining Session #6
Recordings will continue to be posted to our website
Session #4 is definitely one to watch the playback on if you missed it! On top of laying out our wage proposal, last night also included some of our most robust discussion, clerical hijinks, and probably too many jokes about cake.
Much of the discussion centered around why we're bringing so many changes in a one year contract. The ESD reiterated yet again that they believe our current contract is sufficient.
That's not what we're hearing from classified staff.
Unequal COLAS, lack of ability to reclass, no third party review for complaints- all of these things add up to a lack of voice for classified staff. Our team is committed to putting in the work to address that. That means we are willing to come back to bargaining in a year unless the ESD is able to meaningfully address concerns in a longer contract:
⭐ Fair wages
⭐ Third party arbitration for grievances
❌ No unilateral right to 15 furlough days without consulting us
❌ No unilateral right to contract out our jobs
❌ No blanket waiver of our right to bargain further issues
Our package does three things:
Restructuring the wage schedule for clarity and consistency - ranges are alphabetical and steps increase a consistent percentage.
An 8% cost of living adjustment to make up the 12.52% compounded purchasing power deficit accumulated since 2018
Targeted reclassifications for positions that would otherwise remain significantly under market rate
⏰ What Was Discussed
Our team a summary of our wage proposal laying out our intent and rationale along with:
Article 4 - Management Rights
Article 5 - Union Rights
Article 8 - Personnel Records
Article 11 - Grievance Procedure
Article 16 - Vacancies, Transfers, and Job Postings
Article 20 - Compensation
Article 22 - Reclassification, Job Descriptions
The ESD brought:
Article 7 - Union Dues
Article 14 - Leaves of Absence
Article 23 - Strikes and Lockouts
Article 24 - Contracting Out
Article 25 - Labor Management Committee
There was a robust discussion, but no additional proposals were exchanged in the room.
✒️ What Was Decided:
Both parties discussed what proposals each team would bring to next session and agreed to finalize some date questions offline.
🗓️ What Comes Next:
April 23rd at 2:30p - Bargaining Session #5
Recordings will continue to be posted to our website
Session #3 started the official 150 day bargaining timeline- we'll talk more about what this means and what it doesn't over the coming weeks. The ESD also presented on it's current financials and we all learned the fun fact that our classified staff collectively work around 500,000 hours every year- that's nearly 60 years per year!
This session also laid out the remainder of the topics we'll be discussing for the throughout this process, which means (you guessed it!) we largely discussed compensation.
Our team did not present a wage package yet, but we did share what it will look like which should give you an idea of why we're taking our time. We're looking at a wage package that includes substantial reclassifications in addition to discussing step placement and cost of living adjustments. When we have some positions making 25% less than comparable jobs in our region, and other positions making poverty wages, we know we need to be using every tool in the toolbox and get creative.
The ESD affirmed again that they believe our current contract is sufficient and brought their remaining articles without intent to open anything else. They shared that when they looked at the overall cost of our contract, they wanted to prioritize wages which was why their proposal has:
❌No increase to professional development dollars
❌Insurance contributions that would result in a loss in benefits
This would be dramatically less than our current adjustment which is already the lowest in the agency.
Suffice to say, our proposal is going to look a little different so stay tuned.
Everyone had a good laugh at Anderson's unique citation of the Public Employee Collective Bargaining Act, commonly known as the PECBA. While we love the protections afforded under the PECBA, we want members to be able to navigate their rights without having to be familiar with every nuance of labor law and that's why we want things spelled out clearly.
⏰ What Was Discussed
Our team expressed the remaining articles we'd be proposing in the future as well as several completed articles:
Article 7 - Union Dues
Article 13 - Paid Leaves of Absences
Article 14 - Unpaid Leaves of Absences
Article 15 - Paid Vacation
Article 17- Insurance Benefits
Article 18 - Holidays
Article 21 - Professional Development
Intent to Open: 19 - Layoff/Recall, 20 - Compensation, 22 - Reclassification, Job Description, NEW X2 - Classified Staff with Licensure, Appendices A & B
The ESD brought:
Article 21 - Professional Development
Article 22 - Reclassification, Job Description
Article 17 - Insurance Benefits
Article 20 - Compensation
This was another session with a lot to chew on and neither party prepped responses in the room and ended early.
✒️ What Was Decided:
Both parties discussed what proposals each team would bring to next session
🗓️ What Comes Next:
April 9th at 2:30p - Bargaining Session #4
Recordings will continue to be posted to our website
Feb 27 2026
This week we started to get into some bigger swings and some longer questions. We are still early in the process with nothing tentatively agreed to and wrapped up early since we'd all need more time to propose a substantial counter.
The ESD affirmed what we shared in our last update: they are continuing to put forward existing contract language with minimal changes because they feel like our current contract is sufficient.
We all know our colleagues deserve better. There are serious issues that classified staff have raised that need to be addressed systemically. That's why our counter on Working Condition this week was more than double the length of the ESDs initial proposal. We included robust safety language and equitable supports for comp time, travel, and remote work as well as a brand new article on technology protections to safeguard staff privacy.
We all know our students deserve better. The issues that classified staff raise are because poor working conditions lead to worse outcomes for the communities we serve. The ESD had a lot of questions when we proposed removing language that gave them the right to replace classified staff with contractors. That type of language and power is both incredibly rare due to the way it can easily be weaponized to undermine employee rights, but it also just hasn't solved the problems that leave some positions hard to fill. We want to work together to actually solve those problems, improve working conditions for all staff, and provide the supports we know kids deserve.
*Shout out to a handful of our staff who started with us as contractors! The issue is not with the contractors themselves but with systems the ESD needs to work with us to fix!
⏰ What Was Discussed
Our team brought some new proposed language as well as some responses from language on several articles all around working conditions:
Counter Proposal: Article 2 - Recognition
Counter Proposal: Article 10 - Probation
Counter Proposal: Article 12 -Working Conditions
Article 16 - Vacancies, Transfers, and Job Postings
Article 24 - Contracting Out
Article 25 - Labor Management Committee
NEW Article X1 Technology
The ESD brought several counters as well, in addition to new language:
Counter Proposal: Article 8 - Personnel Records
Article 13 - Paid Leaves of Absence
Article 15 - Paid Vacation
Article 16 - Vacancies, Transfers, and Job Postings
Article 19 - Layoff/Recall
This session had some big language to review, so neither party prepped responses in the room.
✒️ What Was Decided:
We agreed to send out the flyer that was jointly prepared regarding your legal right to discuss bargaining, proposals, and working conditions at work.
We also agreed to just skip the bargaining session currently scheduled during spring break and instead resume as normal afterwards. With a make up session on April 3rd to potentially be added. More info on that as decisions are made.
🗓️ What Comes Next:
March 12th at 2:30p - Bargaining Session #3
Recordings will continue to be posted to our website
Lastly- a very special shoutout to Scott and Tawny on our facilities team. They fixed the doorknob to our caucus room after last session and let us back in this session after we accidentally got locked out. Bargaining is serious business, but we're lucky to have a bargaining team and an entire unit that always brings a sense of humor!
Feb 13 2026
This week our bargaining team sat down with the ESD to officially begin trading proposed contract language. No articles were tentatively agreed to yet (which is not unusual at this phase) and we were able to wrap up right on time ready to finalize our next round of proposals.
Shout out to the more than 50 staff who tuned from across all four counties in to stay informed and show support! It really is one of the best things you can do to support a fair wages and working conditions. For those that are able- we're looking forward to seeing you next time!
⏰ What Was Discussed
Our team brought proposed language on several articles all around contract enforcement:
Article 1 - Preamble
Article 3 - Term of Agreement
Article 4 - Management Rights
Article 5 - Union Rights
Article 8 - Personnel Records
Article 9 - Discipline and Dismissal
Article 11 - Grievance Procedure
Article 23 - Strikes and Lockouts
Article 26 - General Provisions
The ESD brought several of these as well, in addition to:
Article 2 - Recognition
Article 6 - Payroll Deductions
Article 10 - Probation
Article 12 - Working Conditions
We prepared a counter to Article 6 with our proposed language around Payroll Deductions. Our proposed language largely focused on folks having access to accurate leave balances and protections in the event of payroll errors.
We also discussed the joint message we will be sending out regarding legal right to discuss bargaining, proposals, and working conditions at work.
✒️ What Was Decided:
We tabled Article 3, meaning we will come back to it at a later session. This is very common as determining the length of the contract is heavily contingent on the rest of the contract.
OSEA will be preparing counter proposals for: Articles 2, 6, and 10
The ESD will be preparing counter proposals for Articles 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 23, and 26
*The ESD largely presented status quo language (minimal changes) as compared to OSEA which is why they are preparing more of the counter proposals.
🗓️ What Comes Next:
Feb 26th at 2:30p - Bargaining Session #2
The recording from last night is available on our website
Whenever you tune in, we hope everyone enjoyed us putting up a placeholder slide while we caucused. We all agreed we could do something more fun next time- so if you reply to this email with suggestions of songs to add to our new 🎺Raucous Caucus Playlist🎺 we'll try and keep things interesting while you wait!
Feb 11 2026
The webinar link is officially live which means you have everything you need to tune in to our first bargaining session this Thursday, Feb 12th at 2:30pm. Tuning in to bargaining is considered a protected activity which means you can do it during work hours. For folks who are student facing or otherwise unable to tune in, we will be recording meetings and making those recordings available.
If you are able to, remember- the best thing you can do is also the easiest: just tune in!
This small act of solidarity really does have a huge impact.
But what can you expect us to discuss at bargaining? What are the priority areas that our chapter has identified?
💸 87% of respondents ranked Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) as one of their highest priorities
🪜The next highest priority was Step Movement with 78% ranking it a high priority
There were a number of other themes that absolutely driven our draft proposals- but no other priority broke a 50% majority in the same way. This was also reflected in the narrative responses that were submitted with respondents consistently expressing that they love the work they get to do, but are struggling to make ends meet.
We hear you loud and clear- wages are crucial. Which is why it won't be something that is discussed in our first session. What you can expect at a later session is a competitive, livable, and fair wage proposal that is also reasonable for the ESD based on the current budget forecast.
Jan 16 2026
This past Tuesday our bargaining team sat down with the ESD for the first time to discuss contract negotiations. We were able to end early and walk out with our ground rules established, our first meeting set, and some additional next steps planned. Expect to receive regular updates after each session keeping you in the know about what is going on and what comes next.
⏰ What Was Discussed
Ground Rules & Bargaining Schedule
✒️ What Was Decided:
Ground Rules were tentatively agreed to (sometimes referred to as TA'ing or something being TA'd) with the intent to sign. A copy of this will be shared with membership once it is signed.
Notably, these ground rules establish that all future meetings will be open to the public and virtually streamed.
The first bargaining session was scheduled for Feb 12th with the intent to hold every other Thursday at 2:30p for subsequent sessions.
🗓️ What Comes Next:
Feb 12th at 2:30p - Bargaining Session #1 - stay tuned for a link to watch virtually!
Prior to that you will see a follow up with the results from the bargaining survey about the priorities that you identified and how that's reflected in our proposals.
In the coming weeks, the ESD has also agreed to develop and distribute a joint message affirming bargaining unit members' legal right to discuss bargaining, proposals, and working conditions at work.
We even have a handy flyer outlining all of the things you are legally allowed to discuss without threat or discipline for you to pin up in your space!